Overexpression of Cyclin A and Cyclin B1Proteins in Astrocytomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cyclins are proteins that are expressed during the progression of a normal cell through the cell cycle. In a number of cancers, overexpression of cyclin A and cyclin B1 proteins has been reported, and in some instances the levels of expression correlated well with the grades of malignancy. The expression of cyclin A and cyclin B1 proteins in astrocytoma may be linked to the histologic grade or proliferative activities. OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of cyclin A and cyclin B1 proteins in astrocytomas and correlate the labeling indices (LIs) of cyclin A and cyclin B1 with histologic grade and Ki-67 LI. DESIGN: The surgical biopsy specimens from 65 adults with astrocytomas were reviewed and divided into grades based on the World Health Organization system. The paraffin sections were immunostained using primary antibodies against Ki-67, cyclin A, and cyclin B1. The LIs of these astrocytomas for the 3 different antibodies were determined by computerized image analysis. RESULTS: The cyclin A LI showed good correlation with astrocytoma grade and Ki-67 LI. Both the nuclear and cytoplasmic cyclin B LIs correlated well with the tumor grade but showed poor correlation with Ki-67 LI. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that although both cyclin A and B protein expression are related to the grade of malignancy in astrocytomas, cyclin A levels more generally reflect the proliferative state of these tumors. We also provide indirect evidence that cyclin B1 is associated with the aberrant progression through the G2-M phase checkpoint in astrocytomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".