L’adolescence, moment de grands changements : que savent les enseignants de cette période?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lorsque les élèves entrent au secondaire, ils doivent assurer leur réussite scolaire, mais aussi composer avec de nombreux changements biopsychosociaux (Mackenzie, E., McMaugh, A. & O’Sullivan, K-A., 2012; Smith, 2006). Les adolescents raffinent leurs habiletés sociales, développent leur autonomie, forment leur identité et transforment leur vision de la famille, des amis et des amours ; ils deviennent aussi sexuellement matures (Cloutier & Drapeau, 2008). Les enseignants, dans leurs façons d’interagir et d’enseigner, influencent l’expérience scolaire et la vie de leurs élèves. Ainsi, les enseignants doivent enseigner la matière, gérer leur classe, atteindre les objectifs du MELS, tout en composant avec leurs élèves en pleine maturation. En tenant compte de l’importance de cette période vie et de l’importance des savoirs dans la pratique enseignante, nous nous demandons : que savent les enseignants de leur objet de travail : les adolescents?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".