MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1856916538

TESTING OF INSECTICIDAL EXTRACT FROM MITRACARPUS SCABER ZUCC. (RUBIALE: RUBIACEAE) AGAINST FOUR STORED FOOD PRODUCTS INSECT PESTS IN IVORY COAST

2014· article· en· W1856916538 on OpenAlexaff
Mamadou Doumbia, Kouassi Yoboue, Dagobert Kouadio Kra, Jan Klimaszewski, Koffi Eric Kwadjo, Bleu Gondo Douan, Mamadou Dagnogo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Entomological Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSitophilusBostrichidaeCurculionidaeRubiaceaeBiologyEuphorbiaceaeBotanyToxicologyHorticulturePEST analysisTraditional medicineMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The comparative insecticide efficiency tests of saturated ethanol and acetonic extracts from leaves of Mitracarpus scaber Zuccarini (Rubiale: Rubiaceae) and Phillanthus amarus Schum and Thonn (Euphorbiale: Euphorbiaceae) against four (4) stored food insect pests showed for the first time that the extracts from Mitracarpus scaber are significantly toxic for Cryptolestes sp, (Coleoptera: Cucujidae), Palorus subdepressus Wollaston (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), and Rhyzopertha dominica Fabricius (Coleoptera : Bostrichidae). However, no toxic impact from the two plant extracts has been observed in regard to Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Entomological ResearchSame topicInsect Pest Control StrategiesFrench-language works237,207