Bibliographic record
Abstract
Challenging the predominant reception of Foucault's works as lacking philosophical consistency, exemplified most recently by For this, the author should be commended. Drawing on a fairly comprehensive, if not always persuasive, exegesis of Foucault's work, Kelly's central argument, productively drawing on Deleuze (1988), is that Foucault's political philosophy consistently approaches matters of the constraints on becoming otherwise through a materialist and anti-subjectivist ontology of violence. Foucault's archaeological works are shown to be an analysis of the violence that discourse does to things thus shaping the macro-level of societal problematisations of existence. The genealogical works are then argued to highlight the microlevel of violence manifested in the intentional exercising of power by individuals over other persons. This distillation then serves as the backdrop for arguing that the practices of critique and ethics are the means for effectively resisting macro-and micro-violence respectively, without falling prey to the traps of humanism, essentialism and utopianism, thus, it is hoped, paving the way for a future revolution, the time of which awaits the announcement of critical intellectuals (137). Readers will find a comprehensive treatment of Foucault's conceptual emphases and the book is well organised. At the same time, since the project is defined in terms of an explication of a consistent ontology in Foucault subtending his approach to the political, Kelly purposely and unfortunately eschews any critical inspection of Foucault (4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".