The Inhibitory Fc[gamma] Receptor is Unnecessary for IVIG Efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) is used as an effective therapy for many different autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The current paradigm for the mechanism underpinning anti-inflammatory effects links IVIG administration to increased expression and activity of the inhibitory Fc[gamma] receptor (Fc[gamma]RIIB) on splenic macrophages. This hypothesis has been disputed in the literature. Here we show that IVIG administered in the context of passive antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia to be therapeutically efficacious in both splenectomized and unmanipulated Balb/c mice despite no upregulation of Fc[gamma]RIIB mRNA in the spleen. Moreover, IVIG effectively ameliorated immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Fc[gamma]RIIB-deficient Balb/c mice, but not in Fc[gamma]RIIB-/- or Fc[gamma]RIIB+/+ control mice with a C57BL6/129S background. Our results demonstrate that Fc[gamma]RIIB is not relevant to the beneficial effects of IVIG. We anticipate that investigators will now shift their research focus away from Fc[gamma]RIIB and seek out other possible mechanism(s) to explain the plethora of diseases and conditions treatable with IVIG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".