MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ectopic RNase E sites promote bypass of 5′‐end‐dependent mRNA decay in <i>Escherichia coli</i>

2002· article· en· W1860911392 on OpenAlexaff
Kristian E. Baker, George A. Mackie

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEmory University
KeywordsRNase PBiologyRibosomeMessenger RNACoding regionCleavage (geology)Escherichia coliCell biologyGeneticsMolecular biologyRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Escherichia coli, 5'-terminal stem-loops form major impediments to mRNA decay, yet conditions that determine their effectiveness or the use of alternative decay pathway(s) are unclear. A synthetic 5'-terminal hairpin stabilizes the rpsT mRNA sixfold. This stabilization is dependent on efficient translational initiation and ribosome transit through at least two-thirds of the coding sequence past a major RNase E cleavage site in the rpsT mRNA. Insertion of a 12-15 residue 'ectopic' RNase E cleavage site from either the rne leader or 9S pre-rRNA into the 5'-non-coding region of the rpsT mRNA significantly reduces the stabilizing effect of the terminal stem-loop, dependent on RNase E. A similar insertion into the rpsT coding sequence is partially destabilizing. These findings demonstrate that RNase E can bypass an interaction with the 5'-terminus, and exploit an alternative 'internal entry' pathway. We propose a model for degradation of the rpsT mRNA, which explains the hierarchy of protection afforded by different 5'-termini, the use of internal entry for bypass of barriers to decay, 'ectopic sites' and the role of translating ribosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207