Peter Beyer and Lori Beaman, eds., Religion, Globalization and Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
W hile the literature on globalization is now quite vast, relatively little has been written -at least directly -on religion and globalization, with the noteworthy exception of Peter Beyer's own earlier work.As the editors correctly note in their introduction to this significant collection of essays, analyses of religion rarely factor into discussions of globalization.When they do, the discussion is limited largely to a consideration of fundamentalism (Christian, Islamic, or otherwise) as a reaction to the forces of globalization.This volume is predicated on the alternative notion that "[l]ike capitalism and the nation-state, religion and religiousness are an integral aspect of whatever we mean by globalization . . .and have been since its inception, wherever and whenever this is located" (p.5).Consequently the focus of attention is on the mainstream traditions across the world, as well as other forms of religious innovation and adaptation, and religious developments are treated as the creative sources, carriers, and consequences of the cross-cultural processes of social change that are identified with globalization.This is a substantial volume, both in size, range, and depth of coverage.The twenty-seven chapters are likely to be used selectively by most readers, but it provides a good balance of theoretical and empirical materials dealing with everything from the instrumental role of religion in new cultural configurations (e.g., alternative and immigrant religious groups in Europe) and forms of social action (e.g., religious NGOs) to the specific manifestations and implications of attendant religious changes in different regions and cultures (e.g., Japan and Korea, Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America).The chapters are divided into four parts: Theoretical and Global Perspectives; Religious Institutions and Globalization; Key Issues in the Relation of Religion, Globalization and Culture; and Regional Particularizations.Only a selection of themes and specific arguments will be treated here, in part because of the sheer volume and diversity of material covered, but also because the book lacks a sufficiently delineated and overarching conception of "globalization."The authors' sense and application of this concept are too variant, a problem most readers would anticipate.But the editors could have mitigated the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".