MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W186164724

The Eloquence of Light

2016· article· en· W186164724 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedroomQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtVisual artsEngineeringHistoryArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

wasn't the cold of modern technological society; it was the cold that comes from winter air, drifting through cracks in bare walls and uninsulated ceilings. The place was the attic of an old house; huge, with blackened beams coming to a point, unfinished wood floorboards, no heat, no insulation, no electricity. The rent was fifty dollars a month, with no utilities, for there were none. In a part of the attic separated from the rest by a makeshift wall of rattan hangings, a window looked out onto the quiet street, with a view above houses of fields, stretching into the distance. This was my bedroom. I worked a few nights each week at a pizza parlor, until three, sometimes four in the morning. I set up a cot for my bed, and strung extension cords up the stairs for lights, a space heater, and a hot plate. I got in the habit of staying up until nearly dawn every night, reading, drawing ink pictures on a little pad, smoking pot. During the days I went to the library, or tried natural foods recipes (yogurt made on a hot plate), or meditated. I meditated using the method of a yoga group I'd joined in college: Brah-ma, the first syllable in the inhale, the second on the exhale, focusing all the time on a spot in the middle of my forehead. Sometimes I would feel energy bursting out the top of my head, until I lifted and floated with the stars. Other times when I opened my eyes everything seemed vivid, rich and peaceful; the window

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicJungian Analytical PsychologyFrench-language works237,207