MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1861835125 · doi:10.5430/wje.v5n6p14

Effects of ICT Integration in Management of Private Secondary Schools in Nairobi County, Kenya: Policy Options and Practices

2015· article· en· W1861835125 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Richard Oyier, Paul A. Odundo, Ganira Khavugwi Lilian, Kahiga Ruth Wangui

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyBusinessCurriculumGovernment (linguistics)Private sectorFinancial managementPublic relationsEconomic growthFinanceEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The convergence between telecommunication, broadcasting multimedia and related technologies commonly known asInformation and Communication Technologies (ICT), promises a fundamental change in educational management.ICT could be the missing tool in improving efficiency of private secondary schools to cope with rapidly changingworld to effectively meet management tasks combined with flexibility in learning and administrative activitiesessential in enhancing efficiency in educational institutions. Little evidence explains effect of ICT in private secondaryschools management across the globe. The study investigated effects of ICT in management in private secondaryschools in Nairobi. A survey design was adopted with target population of 140 private schools and information wassourced from 40 principals, who were randomly sampled. The study found that the adoption of ICT is high in privateschools irrespective of curriculum offered. The use of ICT with schools having installed current hardware and softwarerequired for implementation of ICT strategy in management. Findings revealed that use of ICT is more in schools withhigher enrollment and having both day and boarding components. Uses of ICT enabled institutions achieveimprovements in financial, administrative and instruction management. In financial management 62.5% of schools hadautomated accounts, 71.9% payroll and 53.1% budgeting operations. In administrative management 68.75%automated stores, 56.25% students’ records and 62.50% staff records. In instructional management 53.10% automatedtimetabling, 84.30% examinations and 76.90% students’ progress reports. The study recommends regular training ofadministrators and staff on emerging technologies in school management, deliberate budgetary allocation to procurehardware and software to support ICT in management and government policy to implement ICT in management at alltiers of the economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicEducational Management and QualityFrench-language works237,207