Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, and thrombosis risk in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the prevalence of 2 prothrombotic genetic factors, factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation, is increased in patients with antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies with a history of venous/arterial thrombosis compared to patients with aPL antibodies with no history of thrombosis. METHODS: One hundred fifty-seven patients with aPL antibodies were studied. The occurrence of venous and arterial thrombotic events since the time of antibody detection was determined retrospectively, using appropriate clinical and diagnostic criteria. Clinical risk factors for thrombosis were documented and included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cigarette smoking, diabetes, positive family history, use of oral contraceptive, pregnancy, trauma, hospitalization, varicose veins, and malignancy. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood cells for determination of factor V Leiden mutation G1691 --> A and prothrombin mutation G20210 --> A by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: Of 157 patients, 69 had a history of thrombosis (venous 37, arterial 32); 147 (94%) patients had anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies; 69 (45%) had lupus anticoagulant (LAC). The prevalence of factor V Leiden in patients with thrombosis was 13% compared to 4.6% in patients without thrombosis (OR 3.11, CI 0.92-10.6). In patients with aCL antibodies, 15% of patients with arterial thrombosis had factor V mutation compared to 3.5% of patients without thrombosis (OR 4.9, CI 1.2-19.3). The prothrombin gene mutation was identified in 5 patients, none of whom had thrombosis. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that LAC (p = 0.005), male sex (p = 0.04), and hypertension (p = 0.03) were the strongest risk factors for developing thrombosis and that no additional risk was conferred by factor V Leiden (p = 0.13) and prothrombin gene mutation. CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of factor V Leiden is modestly increased in patients with autoimmune aPL antibodies and thrombosis, these results suggest that its detection does not significantly increase the risk of a thrombotic event, once other clinical risk factors have been considered. Prothrombin gene mutation is not associated with thrombosis in patients with aPL antibodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".