MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1864016626 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2015-0016

Study of the anti-angiogenic effects of cardiolipin by the aortic ring assay

2015· article· en· W1864016626 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Matthew Carnevale, Andreas Bergdahl

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia UniversityBarth Syndrome Foundation
KeywordsCardiolipinAngiogenesisMicrovesselChemistryCell biologyBiophysicsPhospholipidMembraneInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiolipin (CL), a phospholipid found in the inner mitochondrial membrane in all cell types, is critical for the function of the electron transport chain. The role of CL is not fully understood, but it is assumed that the molecule maintains membrane potential and architecture and compensates for alterations in homeostasis that could affect the energy metabolism. The objective of this project was to determine the effects of increasing CL concentrations on angiogenic sprouting by using the aortic ring assay model. For this, 5-day-old C57Bl/6 pups were euthanized by cervical dislocation prior to removal of the aortas. The vessels were cleaned, cut in 0.5 mm wide rings, and placed in a collagen growth matrix supplemented with CL. The results revealed a highly significant reduction of sprout growth (both length and quantity) at low, physiological concentrations. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that CL significantly reduces microvessel formation and that it could potentially provide an interesting novel therapeutic target for angiogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207