MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1864088627 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v7n6p105

The Economic Impact of Climate Change on Optimal Allocation of Water Resources in Agricultural Sector (Case Study: Sarbaz River Basin of Sistan and Baluchestan Province)

2015· article· en· W1864088627 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmoud Hashemi Tabar, Ahmad Akbari, Javad Shahraki

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAgricultureWater resourcesLivelihoodCroppingAgricultural productivityScarcityWater scarcityPrecipitationNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementEffects of global warmingBusinessEnvironmental resource managementGlobal warmingGeographyEcologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agriculture as the largest user of water resources and providing for human needs, water resources management is faced with many challenges. On the other hand, climate change and weather conditions resulted in the production of agricultural products subject to this change. Scarcity of water resources due to reduced precipitation patterns change and global temperature has increased agricultural production and food supply is affected. Due to the adverse effects of climate change on various sectors of production, ecological and human communities, of climate change could be one of the most important environmental challenges mentioned century. Sistan and Baluchestan Province, one of which, unfortunately, has witnessed successive droughts and livelihood and economic problems it has caused, therefore, water management and determine an optimal cropping pattern is consistent with climate change; step is useful for planning and development of the agricultural sector. The aim of this study is to investigate climate change in the southern zone using the GCM, the effects of climate change (precipitation and temperature) crops into the region and a consistent pattern of socio-economic optimization using fuzzy multi-objective programming model is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207