MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 191: Community Uptake of a Smartphone Application to Recruit Bystander Basic Life Support for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

2012· article· en· W18641357 on OpenAlexaff
Steven C. Brooks

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBystander effectBasic life supportMedical emergencyAdvanced cardiac life supportIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: PulsePoint is a smartphone application that links bystanders with the 911 response to cardiac arrest. The application facilitates bystander basic life support while EMS personnel are en route. After community members download the free software to their smartphones, they can receive automated alerts directing them to nearby public location out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and public AED locations. Objective: To quantify the uptake of the PulsePoint application in two Californian communities. Methods: PulsePoint was launched in San Ramon December 2011 and in San Jose February 2012. Promotional efforts in both communities included mass media campaigns, public service announcements in theatres and the use of social media outlets (e.g. Twitter and Facebook). Data from iTunes, Android Market and the PulsePoint enterprise server were collected to document uptake. Results: As of May 27, 2012 there were 23,069 PulsePoint application downloads (18,000 iOS, 5,069 Android). Figure 1 shows the cumulative installations of the PulsePoint application over time. The number of devices registered on the PulsePoint server is 11,167, accounting for users who removed the application from their device after installation. Of those devices registered, only 30% (3,350/11,167) have settings configured to receive cardiac arrest alerts. To date, there have been 64 suspected cardiac arrest incidents associated with a PulsePoint alert. Conclusion: There has been significant uptake of the PulsePoint application in San Ramon and San Jose with an increasing number of users over time. Future work should focus on methods to maximize the number of users configuring the cardiac arrest alerts feature to be active, to encourage retention of the application and determining the effectiveness of the application with respect to increasing bystander CPR, AED use and survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims in the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→