Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening complication of a variety of conditions. Tumours, including angiosarcoma lung metastases, are an unusual cause of pulmonary haemorrhage. METHODS: Report of a case. RESULTS: This case describes a 38-year-old previously healthy male who presented with chest wall bruising followed by haemoptysis and a cerebellar haemorrhage. The patient developed diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage. A biopsy of the chest wall lesion indicated a haematoma and an open-lung biopsy suggested the diagnosis of vasculitis. The patient died within 3 months after initial presentation and an autopsy revealed a chest wall angiosarcoma with pulmonary and cerebellar metastases. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary angiosarcoma metastases should be included in the differential diagnosis of diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage, especially in a young, previously healthy patient with normal renal function, particularly as the pathological diagnosis may be difficult and even misleading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".