MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1865515972 · doi:10.29173/cjs6296

Sociology's Don Giovanni: Joachim Radkau, Max Weber: A Biography

2009· article· en· W1865515972 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kieran Flanagan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWeber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographySociologyArt historyManagementArtEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some years ago, a colleague's choice of an image for the jacket cover of his specialist study of Durkheim generated mixed feelings of mirth and violation.The photograph was of Durkheim, clearly on holidays, asleep in a deckchair.The image seemed to trespass on a received sensibility that the Olympian founding figures of sociology were not to be trivialized in such a way but then, they were human after all, presumably living in the real world, and, like everybody else, went on holidays.By degrees, elevations of the major sociologists have been lowered to earth as expectations of embodiment, biography, and reflexivity have crept into the discipline's accounting for its analytical destiny.Far from destroying the legacies of sociology, these domestic inspections have greatly enhanced understandings of the discipline's own intellectual capital and its peculiar forms of accumulation.Reflections on their intellectual and cultural milieux, their networkings, and their personalities have greatly enhanced understandings of Goffman, Bourdieu, and Durkheim.Radkau's biography reflects this paradigm shift, producing what might be termed a "new Weber."Seldom has a biography of a sociologist been more justified.In Weber, there is a mysterious interchange between his prophetic powers regarding modernity and his own personality.Were the gloomy visions of this seer based on analytical conjecture, were they the projections of a self at war with itself, or both?The sense that Weber has to be understood by reference to his inner self famously emerges in that last sentence of his Hamlet-like lecture "Science as a Vocation," when he conceives of ultimate duty as the "demon who holds the fibres of his very life."Given that few sociologists feel so possessed, what did Weber mean?Radkau explores these "demons," which were not solely metaphorical, but were a codeword for the nocturnal emissions that so debilitated Weber that he abandoned academic life for a significant period.Weber also suffered from neurasthenia that impaired his capacity to work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicWeber, Simmel, Sociological TheoryFrench-language works237,207