PCFinder: an intelligent product recommendation agent for e-commerce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are many e-commerce applications on the Web. A common shortcoming is the lack of customer service and marketing analysis tools in most e-commerce web sites. In order to overcome this problem, we have constructed an intelligent agent based on Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and collaborative filtering, which we have included in our product recommendation system, called PCFinder. This system was four main characteristics. The first is applying novel methodologies based on CBR to an e-commerce application. We propose a heuristic to represent an Order-Based Similarity Measure, together with the method of weight modification and adaptation. The second is applying CBR and collaborative filtering techniques to make our intelligent agent more efficient and effective. We also apply clustering analysis techniques to assist our intelligent agent for grouping the customers according to their long-term profiles in order to analyze the user profiles (external attributes) and provide some suggestions of the items (internal attributes) of the product. The third is introducing a method for constructing product recommendation systems: from architecture to methodologies and from applied technologies to implementations. The last is providing a graphic-building wizard based on clustering analysis of the past purchasing history to the management staff for analyzing the marketing tendencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".