Bibliographic record
Abstract
William Cummings, well known in comparative education circles and who has an extensive personal acquaintance with education systems in many parts of the world, has undertaken a task few contemporary comparativists attempt.He has tackled the job of synthesizing a vast amount of data and, by applying a theoretical framework, has provided a coherent picture of educational systems worldwide.Rather than classifying systems according to regions, the more traditional approach, he has adapted institutional theorizing from anthropology, sociology and economics.Through that approach and a historical analysis he has identifi ed six distinct institutional education systems (in six core nations) and associates them with the emergence of particular representative schools."These fi rst schools embody values and norms that are later imitated and replicated in successor schools as a particular institution of education is systematized and expanded" (p.9).His intention in this undertaking is to understand the ups and downs of educational reforms and "to look deeply into the origins and development of successful and failed reforms" (p.7).In this work, he has made a signifi cant contribution.The fi rst chapter (Thinking about educational revolutions and reform) provides an overview of his six core nations' educational systems, their underlying organization and philosophical underpinnings.In it he also outlines the core propositions in his version of institutionS theory.Echoes of Weber are evident.For some this chapter may be adequate although things are painted with a broad brush, necessarily so under the circumstances.In chapter 2 (The great transformation and the demands for modern education) and chapter 3 (The call for new schools) he presents a historical treatment of the emergence of modern mass education.The case is made that the reasons vary in the six core systems and so different representative schools emerge.Chapter 4 (The systematization and expansion of modern education) focuses on "the differentiation/integration of various educational opportunities both through vertical and horizontal divisions, and the segregation/inclusion of different social groups in 06
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".