Bibliographic record
Abstract
The solubility of Combretum glutinosum gum in distilled water ranged from 30 to 40% and gel fraction ranges between 60 to 70%. It was found that the gum solubility increased with increase the pH of solution. The reduced viscosity of Gum Habeil in distilled water was increased with decrease the concentration of gum solution, and this is the a behavior of ionic polysaccharide solutions, for that Huggins and Kraemer equations are incapable to derive the intrinsic viscosity value of aqueous gum solution. Some extrapolated equations such as Fouss, Schulz –Blaschke, Martin, Heller, and Fedors equations used to estimate the optimum model for measurement intrinsic viscosity of this type of gum. The influence of ion types and ionic strength on the viscosity of gum solutions were also determined. The effect of ionic strength on the intrinsic viscosity of Combretum glutinosum gum was used to determine the salt tolerance value and the chain stiffness parameters of this type of gum. This study exhibited that the values of chain stiffness parameter (B), and salt tolerance (S) of deacetylated gum in the range of 0.0574 to 0.0700, and0.083 to 0.101 dl× M1/2 / g respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".