MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Language and the Status of the Real in William Faulkner’s Light in August: A Historio-cultural Study

2011· article· en· W1868185673 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noorbakhsh Hooti, Vahid Omrani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryMythologyDramatizationFictional universeAestheticsDualismLiteratureOrder (exchange)SociologyHistoryArtPhilosophyNarrativeEpistemologyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tries to bring a historio-cultural analysis of language and the status of the real in Faulkner’s Light in August. The creation of Yoknapatawpha County implies a dualism central to the works of William Faulkner. Yoknapatawpha, Faulkner’s fictional reconstruction of the American South and the land of his birth, expresses his dramatization of what he understood as reality. This involved an awareness of the distinction of a modern society, reified in its history and institutions from an older order of myth and tradition. The creation of Yoknapatawpha was ‘‘a way of controlling, of ordering, of giving a shape and a significance to immense panorama of futility and anarchy which is contemporary history.’’ (Eliot, 1984, p. 201) This dualism of order and disorder, art and reality creates the dual perspective of Faulkner’s fiction which views experience as at once meaningless and significant. This dichotomy helps to define the basic premises of Faulkner’s fictional world by identifying the conflict between the autonomy of the artist and his immersion in history; his power to create an imaginary world free from the constraints of reality and the spatial and temporal coordinates that bind him to that reality. Light in August may be viewed as a significant attempt on Faulkner’s part, at finding a way that could explore and dramatize the polyvalent significance of self, history and art in a modern world denied a fixed referential centre. The result is, what Bakhtin(1981) has called, a truly polyphonic novel that views reality as essentially multiple in nature. Key words: Dualism; Faulkner; Eliot; Yoknapatawpha; Bakhtin; DichotomyResume: Cette etude tente d'apporter une analyse historio-culturelle sur la langue et le statut du reel dans Lumiere d’aout de William Faulkner. La creation du Comte de Yoknapatawpha implique un dualisme au cœur de l'œuvre de William Faulkner. Yoknapatawpha, la reconstruction fictive par Faulkner de l'Amerique du Sud, son lieux de naissance, exprime sa dramatisation de ce qu'il a compris en tant que la realite. Cela impliquait une prise de conscience de la distinction entre une societe moderne, reifiee dans son histoire et des institutions d'un ancien ordre du mythe et de la tradition. La creation de Yoknapatawpha etait ''un moyen de controler, d'ordonner, de donner une forme et une signification a un immense panorama futile et anarchique qui est l'histoire contemporaine.''(Eliot, 1984, p. 201) Ce dualisme de l'ordre et desordre, de l'art et realite cree la double perspective de la fiction de Faulkner qui considere l'experience a la fois insensee et significative. Cette dichotomie permet de definir les premisses de base du monde fictif de Faulkner en identifiant les conflits entre l'autonomie de l'artiste et son immersion dans l'histoire; son pouvoir de creer un monde imaginaire libere des contraintes de la realite et les coordonnees spatiales et temporelles qui le lient a cette realite. Le roman Lumiere d'aout peut etre considere comme une tentative importante de Faulkner de trouver une maniere qui pourrait explorer et dramatiser la signification polyvalente de soi, l'histoire et l'art dans un monde moderne refusant un centre referentiel fixe. Le resultat est ce que Bakhtine (1981) a appele, un vrai roman polyphonique qui traite d’une realite de nature multiple.Mots cles: Dualism; Faulkner; Eliot; Yoknapatawpha; Bakhtine; Dichotomie

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207