The Analysis of Influencing Factors and Promotion Strategy for the Use of Mobile Banking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main factors that influence the mobile banking’ s promotion are specifically analyzed based on the three-factor theory, namely the external environmental factors, internal factors of consumers and marketing factors. It can come to a conclusion that culture, perception of risk, marketing factors are the three main factors that affect mobile banking’ s marketing. Then the effective countermeasures are put forward as well in the paper. Key words: Mobile banking; Consumer behaviour; MarketingResume: Les facteurs de canalisation qui influencent la promotion d'operations bancaires mobile sont specifiquement analyses bases sur la theorie de trois-facteur, a savoir les facteurs environnementaux externes, facteurs internes des consommateurs et facteurs de vente. Elle peut arriver a une conclusion que la culture, perception de risque, lancant des facteurs sur le marche sont les trois facteurs principaux qui affectent la gestion bancaire mobile. Alors les contre-mesures efficaces sont aussi bien proposes dans le papier. Mots cles: Operations bancaires mobiles; Comportement du consommateur; Commercialisation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it