Blood transfusion in acute and chronic pediatric settings: beliefs and practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood has been imbued with powerful connotations through history and across cultures. Currently bestowed with scientific meaning, blood nevertheless carries symbolic resonance. This study examines these representations among practitioners and sheds light on the clinical and nonclinical factors that guide blood transfusion (BT) decision-making in Quebec, Canada. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a qualitative exploratory study design, data were collected in the pediatric intensive care unit and the hematology-oncology unit of Sainte-Justine Hospital in 2009. A total of fifteen 1-hour-long semistructured interviews were conducted with physicians. RESULTS: Physicians affirm that the symbolic connotations of blood found in the lay population do not influence their transfusion decisions. However, there are other "social" and "cultural' aspects that influence these practices. Also, BT strategies remain diverse across units. Practitioners perceive these situations as resulting from insufficient training and by the existence of an "oral tradition" and a professional culture that are resistant to change. CONCLUSION: BT practices differ within and across units. Many dimensions intervene in the decision to transfuse, from individual clinical appreciation and local unit "culture" to formal and ad hoc training. Consistent change in BT can only occur with the implementation of norms and guidelines that are endorsed by key influential figures. An extensive multicentered study is necessary to better understand how social and cultural factors affect BT practices. This knowledge will sustain an enlightened clinical practice and lead to the recognition that peer practices are also embedded in professional cultures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".