THE EFFECT OF EXTREME INTER-CULTURAL EXPERIENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL LEADERSHIP AND DESIGN SKILLS OF FUTURE ENGINEERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a growing focus today in universities on enriching extra--curricular opportunities for students. In engineering departments, these include international exchange, community service learning, and work with organizations such as Engineers Without Borders.During the same period, the move towards outcomes-based accreditation requirements by the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) has challenged institutions to deliver curricular interventions and measure their effectiveness on their graduating classes. As the CEAB is exploring new pedagogical approaches for developing young engineers’ acumen in the areas of leadership, communication, and design, this paper examines the impact of overseas work experience in “extreme” inter-cultural settings on those same attributes.We define an extreme experience as marked not only by what students are doing, but also the geographic and socio-economic context in which they must practice. When students are exposed to situations that defy their expected norms, instincts, and social cues, we expect a resulting cognitive adaptation and growth in collaborative technological interactions. Being engineers, they will manifest this learning when tackling future complex,human-centred design problems.In this study, students who have had an extreme inter-cultural experience are tasked, upon their return, with a team-based design challenge, and then compared with students who have completed an equally engaging but local activity. We propose a methodology for identifying changes in performance on various CEAB outcome areas through the use of qualitative in-situ observation, interviews, and analysis of design outputs. Participants will be surveyed in order to identify specific mechanisms that triggered and contributed to the observed professional development while overseas.Preliminary results are expected on what mechanisms result in observed changes as measured through the CEAB accreditation lens. These results will inform pedagogy and decisions on the integration of similar experiential mechanisms into the engineering curriculum to accelerate student learning and develop the engineering leaders of tomorrow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".