MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1871346787 · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-10-s1-a7

Patient-mediated scale-up of guideline implementation in primary-care: an open-label trial

2015· article· en· W1871346787 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Selby, Laurie Zawertailo, Rosa Dragonetti, Sarwar Hussain, Sabrina Voci

Bibliographic record

VenueImplementation Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVareniclineSmoking cessationFamily medicinePsychological interventionHealth services researchGuidelinePharmacotherapyHealth administrationIncentiveHealth informaticsHealth carePublic healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To advance the knowledge on how to amplify the impact of effective clinical interventions to the population level, we tested an approach that took the traditional model of care delivery, which relied on busy physician practices to initiate treatment and transformed it into a patient-driven model, enabled by web technology and strategic labor distribution among patient, physician and pharmacist. Varenicline and bupropion are effective pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation, but many clinicians do not proactively discuss these options with their smoker patients. Using cost-free medication as an incentive, our objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of enrolling smokers via the internet in a protocol to engage their family physician in a discussion of smoking cessation treatment with pharmacotherapy. Participants visited the study website, provided consent and completed an on-line assessment. Eligible participants received a personalized script to take to their physician, who had the option of prescribing bupropion or varenicline for 12 weeks. Signed scripts were faxed by the physician's office to a central pharmacy that couriered the medication to the patient. Pharmacist provided one session of brief telephone counseling. In 2 months, 893 participants enrolled, of whom 524 (59%) visited 419 different physicians to have the script signed and faxed (265 varenicline, 259 bupropion). All medication packages were delivered, with only 1.0% (n = 5) requiring address clarification or reshipment. At 6-month follow-up, the 7-day point prevalence of abstinence was 30.3% for varenicline vs. 24.3% for bupropion (p >0.1; OR (95%CI): 1.4 (0.8-2.2)). These quit rates are comparable to those seen in randomized clinical trials. The e-patient movement with the world-wide-web as its forum has patients acting as drivers of their healthcare. This emerging characteristic of population behavior provides a new opportunity for rapid scaling-up of implementation of evidence to the state-or national-level that is otherwise extended to limited practice settings. This study was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.706
GPT teacher head0.729
Teacher spread0.023 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImplementation ScienceSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207