Refinement of AODV routing algorithm for wireless mesh networks (WMNs)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) has recently gained popularities due to their fast and economical ways to access to the Internet. Because the WMNs are one of the few commonly implemented types of the ad hoc networks (MANETs), general MANET routing protocols can be used in the WMNs. it also is expected that a protocol that takes the particularities of the WMNs into account will outperform the general protocol. In this paper, we present a reactive routing protocol, called AODV-Mesh, for the WMNs. This protocol is an extension of a common ad hoc routing protocol to be compatible with the specifications of the WMNs. In addition, we discuss the route recovery mechanism of this protocol in two cases; using the local repair mechanism (AODV-Mesh), and not using the local repair mechanism (AODV-Mesh NoLR). Our simulation results show that not using the local repair mechanism in the AODV-Mesh algorithm improves the performance and efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it