L’ajout d’insuline dans les sacs de nutrition parentérale est-elle une pratique rationnelle?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume L’ajout d’insuline lors de perfusion de solution denutrition parenterale est une pratique tres repandue. De nombreux etablissements ont des protocoles permettant l’ajout de ce medicament directement dans la solution nutritive sous le pretexte qu’elle simplifie l’administration de la medication, diminue les couts relies a l’installation d’une deuxieme voie veineuse et qu’elle evite les omissions. Or, il semble que cette pratique entraine de nombreux problemes qui la rendent non recommandable. L’adsorption sur les parois du sac et des tubulures peut entrainer des fluctuations dans les quantites d’insuline administrees aux patients et le fait de sous doser legerement la quantite d’insuline a ajouteraux sacs de nutrition parenterale pour eviter les hypoglycemies et le gaspillage, n’elimine pas la necessite d’avoir recours a une echelle d’ajustement sous cutane. Les nombreuses modifications dans la quantite d’insuline a ajouter aux sacs en cours de traitement peuvent entrainer des pertes et limiter la recuperation des sacs. Il semble donc plus facile, economique et securitaire en definitive d’opter pour une perfusion d’insuline independantede la nutrition parenterale pour administrer ce medicament aux patients sous therapie nutritive intraveineuse. Abstract Addition of insulin in parental nutrition bags: a rational practice? The addition of insulin during the perfusion of parenteral nutrition solution is a widespread practice. Many hospitals have protocols allowing the addition of insulin directly in the nutritive solution under the pretext that it simplifies the administration of the medication, reduces the costs associated with the installation of a second venous route and prevents omissions. Therefore, that practice seems to bring many problems which make it inappropriate. The adsorption on the walls of tubings and container may bring fluctuations in the amounts of insulin administered to patients. Reducing slightly the dose of insulin to add to the containers of parenteral nutrition to avoid hypoglycemias and waste, will not eliminate the need to resort to a subcutaneous adjustment scale. The numerous modifications in the amount of insulin to add to the bags during the treatment may bring losses and limit the recovery of the bags. The insulin infusion seems to be easier, economic and safe when it is independent of the parenteral nutrition in order to administer this medication to patients by intravenous nutrition therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".