MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1874278032 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22253

Serial Hybrid Modelling for a Gold Cyanidation Leaching Plant

2015· article· en· W1874278032 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
张军 Zhang Jun, Zhizhong Mao, Runda Jia, Dakuo He

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGold cyanidationLeaching (pedology)EstimatorComputer scienceTikhonov regularizationBiological systemProcess engineeringAlgorithmEnvironmental scienceEngineeringCyanideMaterials scienceMathematicsMetallurgyInverse problemSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a serial hybrid model of a gold cyanidation leaching process is proposed. The serial hybrid model consists of mass conservation equations of gold and cyanide as well as two kernel partial least square (KPLS) models, which are used as the estimators of the unknown kinetic reaction rates without the complicated kinetic model structures considered. The proposed serial hybrid model makes full use of both the a priori process knowledge and the ability of a data‐driven model to discover the information behind data sets. Moreover, before training the KPLS models, the proposed estimation strategy based on Tikhonov regularization is used to estimate the kinetic reaction rates, which can mitigate the effect of measurement noise on the estimation results effectively. The proposed serial hybrid model has been applied to a gold cyanidation leaching plant to predict the gold leaching rate. The prediction results show that the proposed serial hybrid model can track the real leaching rate of gold closely and has the best prediction accuracy at both dynamic and steady states compared with the pure KPLS and mechanistic models, thereby laying an important foundation for the successful implementation of optimization and control of the leaching process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207