MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1874496557

NUCLEAR DNA CONTENT ANALYSIS OF FOUR CULTIVATED SPECIES OF YAMS (DIOSCOREA SPP.) FROM CAMEROON

2014· article· en· W1874496557 on OpenAlexaff
Marie F. Sandrine, Simon Joly, Mickaël Bourge, Spencer Brown, Dénis Ndoumou Omokolo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Breeding and Genetics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear DNAPloidyDioscoreaBiologyGenome sizePropidium iodideCropPolyploidBotanyGenomeAgronomyGeneticsMitochondrial DNA
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yam ( Dioscorea spp.) is an important food source in Africa, but diseases and storage pests hinder the African farmers to achieve high yields during the harvest. One important limitation to the genetic breeding of yam is the relatively unknown ploidy level variation within and among species.  The objective of this study was to determine the nuclear DNA content of 59 accessions representing four cultivated Dioscorea species collected from three regions of Cameroon (Adamawa, Centre and Southwest) using flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining. Our findings suggested the variation of the genome size both within and among the yams species. Nuclear DNA content (mean 2C-value) in studied yam collection ranging from 0.72 ± 0.013 pg in D. dumetorum to 2.801 ± 0.068 pg in D. cayenensis. The accessions could be divided into four different categories according to their, nuclear DNA content suggestive of four different ploidy levels. Ploidy variation was observed within all species with the exception of D. dumetorum that is likely diploid. This study contributes to a better understanding of the genome characteristics of yam species from Cameroon and may help to the genetic improvement of this important crop in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plant Breeding and GeneticsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207