MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1874558892 · doi:10.33137/rr.v38i4.26391

Princely Citizen: Lorenzo de’ Medici and Renaissance Florence

2016· article· en· W1874558892 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
F. W. Kent, Carolyn James, Colin Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceArtVisual artsArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Francis Kent was working on a retirement opus, a biography of Lorenzo the Magnificent, at the time of his unfortunate diagnosis with cancer in 2008 and his subsequent passing in 2010.In a moving and fitting tribute to this archival master, Carolyn James of Monash University has collected and edited a series of essays, mostly previously published, that served as preparatory and complementary materials to this grand biographical project.These essays form a cohesive whole that is almost biographical, which places Lorenzo's unique character into the deeply social and political Florentine world in which he grew up, ascended to power, and became Il Magnifico.Kent's archival work is masterful, and the essays are based on a career's reading of Laurentian and Medicean correspondence, administrative records, petitions, and other documents.Princely Citizen ranges far and wide in Lorenzo's life, connecting the disparate threads of his upbringing, the women in his life, his artistic patronage, and his increasingly autocratic politics to the development of the Medici regime and Lorenzo's sure-footed navigation of its complexities.The first three essays in Princely Citizen portray the young Lorenzo as born to rule, always preparing for power but uncomfortable with his future role.Kent makes the case effectively that Lorenzo really began actively preparing to take the reins of power upon the death of his grandfather, Cosimo de' Medici, in 1464, though he had been introduced to the practice of patronage even earlier.Lorenzo's well-known romantic side (Kent describes Lorenzo scaling the walls of the convent of Le Murate to prove its nuns' chastity) was also a political tool, as his dealings with the wives of powerful Florentine men are revealed to be as calculated as his shrewdest business deals.However, Kent argues that Lorenzo was also a truly romantic man, whose life was shaped to a great extent by two major love affairs: with Lucrezia Donati, his youthful amore, and with Bartolommea Nasi, the patrician wife of Giovanni Benci with whom Lorenzo was involved in the 1480s.Lorenzo, Kent argues, favoured women who were intelligent and articulate, who did not adhere to the contemporary Florentine advice that women should remain silent and domestic.Kent's third

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207