Perioperative Administration of Antimicrobials During Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative antimicrobial administration during tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) in dogs at the Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 184) that had TPLO (n = 226). METHODS: Medical records were reviewed and data collected included timing and dosage of pre, intra, and postoperative antimicrobial administration, method of stifle inspection, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, development of surgical site infection (SSI), microbiological investigation, implant removal, and possible comorbidities. Univariable analysis was conducted, followed by stepwise forward logistic regression to determine factors associated with SSI. RESULTS: Of the 225 cases administered perioperative antimicrobials, 96 (42.5%) received appropriate perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis based on target times for preoperative and intraoperative dosing. Postoperative antimicrobials were administered to 54 (23.9%) of cases. Surgical site infection was documented in 30 (13.3%) cases. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius was isolated from 15/17 (88.2%) SSI from which a bacterium was isolated, with 6/15 (40%) being methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP). Postoperative administration of antimicrobials was protective for SSI (OR 0.1367; P = .0001; 95% CI = 0.021, 0.50). Duration of anesthesia time was associated with the likelihood of development of SSI (OR = 1.0094; P = .001; 95% CI = 1.00, 1.02). CONCLUSION: Current practices for administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis during TPLO can be improved. There was no association between timing of antibiotic administration that was inconsistent with the target and development of SSI. Further study into risk factors of TPLO SSI is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it