Bibliographic record
Abstract
C'est un chercheur nerlandais, spcialiste de littrature anglaise La Haye, que nous devons cette tude biographique, qui fait toute la lumire sur un pisode peu connu, mais significatif, du sjour en Angleterre de Jean-Jacques Rousseau.Le sujet en est Sir Brooke Boothby (1744-1824), nobliau des Midlands anglais, dont la mmoire perdure de nos jours grce un tonnant portrait la Tate Britain de Londres, peint en 1781 par le grand artiste noclassique (et dj romantique), Joseph Wright of Derby : portrait qui nous prsente Brooke Boothby allong nonchalamment sur l'herbe dans un bosquet, au bord d'un ruisseau ( brook en anglais), coiff d'un grand chapeau noir, la main reposant sur deux grands livres.Mais de son vivant, son vritable titre de gloire tait de s'tre brivement li d'amiti avec Jean-Jacques Rousseau.On sait que celui-ci s'tait rfugi, grce l'entremise de David Hume, Wooton Hall dans le Staffordshire, en 1766-1767.Rousseau et Boothby, propritaire de Ashbourne Hall dans le comt limitrophe du Derbyshire, fraternisrent en tant que chtelains voisins, malgr leur diffrence d'ge, et en raison de leur amour commun de la botanique et l'habitude qu'ils avaient tous deux d'herboriser.Ils se rencontraient souvent dans ce mme bosquet romantique dpeint par Wright, dit des Vingt Chnes , que Rousseau adopta bientt comme lieu de rflexion et de recueillement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".