MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hormonal and morphological study of the pituitaries in reeler mice

2007· article· en· W1877321943 on OpenAlexaff
Matilde Lombardero, Kálmán Kovács, Éva Horváth, Ignacio Salazar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Experimental Pathology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaXunta de Galicia
KeywordsReelerReelinInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyHormonePituitary glandMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reelin is a neuronal glycoprotein that plays a crucial role in brain layer formation during prenatal development. The reeler mutant mouse lacks Reelin, leading to abnormalities in the neuronal layering of cerebral cortex and cerebellum, producing ataxia, tremor and abnormal locomotion. Reeler mice are reported to have growth retardation and most of them are sterile or unable to bring up their newborns. Since the brain is one of the main regulator of pituitary hormone secretion and no information was reported regarding pituitary function and structure in these mutant mice, we studied pituitary endocrine activity and morphology in reeler mice. Mice were classified in three groups as reeler homozygote (RHM), reeler heterozygote (RHT) or control (CO). Pituitary hormone blood levels were assessed by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA). Animals and their pituitaries were weighted and pituitaries were studied by histology, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. Results showed statistically significant differences in body weight and in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) blood levels between the three groups. In contrast, growth hormone (GH) blood levels showed a high individual variation and no decrease in reeler groups compared with CO. Morphological studies revealed no differences in pituitary cell types except that somatotrophs appeared to be slightly smaller in RHM and RHT. Although it seems that pituitary hypofunction is not responsible for growth retardation, more studies are needed to obtain a deeper insight into the endocrine status of these mutant mice to elucidate the cause of their low body weight and reproductive behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Experimental PathologySame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207