Improving neurologic outcome in off-pump surgery: the "no touch" technique.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As patients referred for cardiac surgery include increasingly older individuals, the prevalence of comorbid factors, such as previous cerebrovascular disease, carotid disease, aortic atherosclerosis, and reoperations, is on the rise. Avoiding manipulation of the ascending aorta in this high-risk subgroup may become a necessity to perform safe coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database of 640 off-pump CABG patients and identified 84 patients in whom we adopted the "no touch" technique (NTT). Revascularization was carried out with single or bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITA) and by connecting additional coronary grafts (saphenous vein, radial artery) in a T or Y configuration. The right gastroepiploic artery was used as a conduit in 2 patients. The brachiocephalic artery was used as an alternative inflow site in 3 patients (reoperation). RESULTS: Age, sex, risk factors, functional class, and history of congestive heart failure were comparable in the two groups. In the NTT group, the frequencies were higher for severe atherosclerosis of the aorta (13% versus 0%; P =.00), carotid disease (25% versus 16%; P =.02), and history of previous cerebrovascular accidents (17% versus 8%; P =.04). Complete revascularization was achieved in 96% of the patients in the off-pump CABG group, compared with 90% in the NTT group (P =.17). No differences in the prevalence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, intra-aortic balloon pump use, perioperative myocardial infarction, or operative mortality at 30 days were observed between the two groups. In the NTT group, weak trends toward a lower incidence of postoperative delirium (8% versus 15%; P =.12), a lower incidence of stroke (0% versus 1%; P =.85), and a shorter intensive care unit stay (P =.07) were observed. Hospital stay was also shorter in the NTT group (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Avoiding aortic manipulations in patients with severe atherosclerosis of the aorta, carotid disease, and a previous history of cerebrovascular accidents is technically feasible and is associated with a low risk of mortality and good shortterm results. Adopting this practice may reduce the incidence of stroke and improve early outcome in this subset of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".