MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1877434746

Metadata at Statistics Canada: implementation opportunities and challenges

2010· preprint· en· W1877434746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michel Cloutier, Alice Born

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataAgency (philosophy)Computer scienceData qualityBusinessWorld Wide WebKnowledge managementData scienceMarketingSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Integrated Meta Data Base (IMDB) is a corporate repository of information on each of Statistics Canada’s nearly 400 active surveys. The IMDB was first developed to support the interpretation of data disseminated by the agency and to present the metadata in a consistent manner. The IMDB is one of the principal mechanisms used by Statistics Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.201
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.355
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2010.355
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0190.055
Science and technology studies0.0130.012
Scholarly communication0.0360.038
Open science0.0210.015
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.358
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.073 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptationFrench-language works237,207