Variationnisme et essentialisme au sein des dictionnaires récents de langue français québécois?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENEn este texto se trata de mostrar la relación que existe entre la emergencia de la francofonía institucional en los años sesenta y la automatización del campo del diccionario de Québec con la inclusión de marcas topolectuales en los diccionarios franceses (Petit Robert, Petit Larousse illustré, Dictionnaire Hachette, Dictionnaire du français vivant, etc). Con este objetivo se remontará a los orígenes de la práctica lexicográfica de Québec explicando el paso entre la dialéctica interlectal y la dialéctica intralectal. Finalmente se explicará que a pesar de una visión esencialista de la lengua francesa, diferentes acciones han sido emprendidas para tratar de dar a los quebequeses herramientas matalingüísticas que tomen en cuenta su uso. La modificación de las prácticas metalingüísticas puede ser puesta en relación con el surgimiento de prácticas variacionistas.ABSTRACTIn this text, I will try to show the relation existing between the emergence of the institutional Francophony in the 1960's and the auonomization of the field of the dictionary of Québec with the inclusion of the topolectal marks in the French dictionaries (the Petit Robert, Petit Larousse illustré, Dictionnaire Hatchette, Dictionaire du français vivant, etc). Withi this intention I will go up with the sources of the problematics to the intralectal problematics. Finally, I will explain that, in spite of an essentialist vision of the French language, various actions were undertaken to try to give to the Quebequers metalinguistics tools taking into acount their particularities. The modification of the metalinguistics practices can be compared with the rise of variation practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".