MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1878052095 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1986.1168565

Time delay estimation with nonstationary signals

2005· article· en· W1878052095 on OpenAlexaff
G. Lampropoulos, Y.T. Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundTime domainDiscrete time and continuous timeUpper and lower boundsAlgorithmConvergence (economics)Computer scienceModulation (music)MathematicsCross-correlationControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationEstimation theoryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents two new techniques with time-modulated (i.e., time expansion or compression) discrete sequences. One for generating such sequences and the other for estimating the time delay between these sequences. The Time-Varying Discrete Fourier Transform (TVDFT) is introduced to generate time-modulated discrete signals. For time delay estimation, two time-modulated received signals are cross-correlated in the frequency domain, via TVDFT. Compensation of their time-modulation effect is realized by searching for perfect matching between them. A new optimization technique is specifically developed for maximizing the cross-correlation function. The optimization vector has as elements the time delay and a preassinged number of time-modulation coefficients. This optimization technique is a modification of the N-STEP Newton method and guarantees convergence to the local maximum. At high Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the scheme attains the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) in variance. Simulation results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the scheme and to confirm the validity of the development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207