Fitness is a determinant of the metabolic response to endurance training in adolescents at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to determine whether changes in cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with the metabolic response to endurance training in adolescents at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Seventy-three overweight and obese adolescents completed a 6-month endurance exercise intervention. Total fat mass, trunk fat mass, visceral adipose tissue, and liver fat were assessed with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy. RESULTS: The change in cardiorespiratory fitness with training was independently associated with reductions in BMI z-score (β = -0.09; P = 0.006), total fat mass (β = -1.40; P = 0.007), trunk fat mass (β = -0.70; P = 0.01), and liver fat (β = -1.80; P = 0.053). Adolescents within the highest tertile of change in fitness were 4.67 (95% CI: 1.15-13.73; P = 0.03), 11.90 (95% CI: 2.37-59.77; P = 0.002), and 6.21 (95% CI: 1.14-33.99; P = 0.035) times more likely to experience decreases in body weight, BMI, and liver fat compared with adolescents in the lowest tertile. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in adiposity and hepatic triglyceride content in response to endurance training are significantly related to the increase in cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents at risk of T2DM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".