Un modelo de arquitectura militar islámica: La alcazaba o cuartel Rifeño de Djenada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa alcazaba o rifeno de Djenada (conocida tambien como cuartel moro de Santiago) fue una fortificacion islamica construida a finales del siglo XVIII y organizada por las fuerzas de rifenos guelayas. Corresponde a un modelo basado en parametros tecnicos aparentemente arcaicos, pero de gran efectividad ofensiva al constituirse en cabecera de una red de trincheras que circundaban muy de cerca a la fortaleza de Melilla. Contaba tambien en su interior con una mezquita u oratorio, por lo que asumia en parte las funciones de una rabida o ribat. La envergadura de su arquitectura y posibilidades de defensa siempre fueron bastante modestas, y fue finalmente demolida por el ejercito marroqui en cumplimiento de los acuerdos diplomaticos firmados entre Marruecos y Espana, al quedar dentro de la zona de soberania que estos tratados atribuian a la corona espanola. EnglishThe fortress or rifeno quarter of Djenada -wellknown also as quarter Moor of Santiago- was an Islamic fortification built at the end of century XVIII and organized by the forces of guelayas rifenos. It corresponds to a model based on apparently archaic technical parameters, but of great offensive effectiveness when constituting itself in head of a system of trenches surrounding the Melilla strength. It also counted in his interior with a oratory or mosque, reason why one partly assumed the functions of rabida or ribat. The spread of their architecture and possibilities of defense always were quite modest, and finally was demolished by the Moroccan army in accordance with the signed diplomatic agreements between Morocco and Spain, when being into the zone of sovereignty that these treaties attributed to the Spanish crown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".