Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the leg length measurements with a tape measure. The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) the validity of the leg length measurements through comparison with x-rays, and 2) the intertester reliability. Thirty healthy subjects between the ages of 18 and 65 were studied. Each subject was positioned supine on an x-ray table. A radiopaque ruler marked in 1 mm increments was placed on the table. Two physical therapists measured the right leg length of each subject from anterior superior iliac supine to medial malleolus with a pliable metal tape measure. X-rays were taken by the slit scanography method. Pearson product-moment and intraclass correlation coefficients (r and ICC, respectively) were used to analyze the data. The value of r for the comparison: 1) between therapists was 0.98, 2) between therapist 1 and x-ray measure was 0.98, and 3) between therapist 2 and x-ray measure was 0.98. The value of ICC for the comparison: 1) between therapists was 0.99, 2) between therapist 1 and x-ray measure was 0.99, and 3) between therapist 2 and x-ray measure was 0.99. The findings of this study indicate that the leg length measurements from anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus with tape measure are valid and reliable. Hence, confidence can be placed in the accuracy of clinical measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986;8(4):185-188.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".