MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The expression of a novel antisense gene mediates incompatibility within the large <i>repABC</i> family of α‐proteobacterial plasmids

2004· article· en· W1880436856 on OpenAlexafffund
Shawn R. MacLellan, Laura Anne Smallbone, Christopher D. Sibley, Turlough M. Finan

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyRepliconGeneticsGenePlasmidSinorhizobium melilotiExtrachromosomal DNAUntranslated regionIntergenic regionGenomeRNAMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large extrachromosomal replicons in many members of the alpha-proteobacteria encode genes that are required for plant or animal pathogenesis or symbiosis. Most of these replicons encode repABC genes that control their replication and faithful segregation during cell division. In addition to its chromosome, the plant endosymbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti also maintains the 1.4 Mb pSymA and 1.7 Mb pSymB symbiotic megaplasmids both of which are repABC-type replicons. In all repABC loci that have been characterized, an apparently untranslated intergenic region between the repB and repC genes encodes a strong incompatibility determinant (referred to as incalpha). Here we report the isolation of mutations within the incalpha regions of pSymA and pSymB that eliminate incompatibility. These mutations map to and inactivate a promoter in the intergenic region that drives the expression of an approximately 56 nucleotide untranslated RNA molecule that mediates incompatibility. This gene, that we have named incA, is transcribed antisense to the repABC genes. Our analysis suggests that the incA gene is conserved in repABC loci from a diverse spectrum of bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207