Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deathbed care is the most humanization development in human society. It is one of the highest embodiments of humanism in modern society and the concrete representation of human orientation as well. This paper introduces the deathbed care and its origin, examines the work contents, and discusses the development and current situation of deathbed care in China. It also explores the developmental road of deathbed care in China. Keywords: Deathbed care, life, quality Resume La sollicitude a l’agonie est le developpement humanise de la societe humaine, l’une des incarnations au plus haut niveau de l’humanisme dans la societe moderne et l’expression concrete du principe de la primaute de l’homme. Cet essai traite l’apparition de la sollicitude a l’agonie, son contenu, son developpement et sa situation presente en Chine dans le but d’explorer la voie de developpement de la sollicitude a l’agonie de la Chine. Mots-cles: sollicitude a l’agonie, vie, qualite 摘 要 臨終關懷是人類社會最具人性化的發展，是人道主義在現代社會的最高體現之一，也是以人為本的具體表現。本文從臨終關懷及其緣起、臨終關懷的工作內容、中國臨終關懷的發展與現狀進行探討，探索中 國臨終關懷的發展道路。 關鍵詞：臨終關懷；生命；品質
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".