MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cognitive outcome of parietooccipital resection in children with epilepsy

2010· article· en· W1881446278 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Lippé, Christine Bulteau, Georg Dorfmüller, F. Audren, Olivier Delalande, Isabelle Jambaqué

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuropsychologyEpilepsyCognitionCortical dysplasiaPsychologyAudiologyIntelligence quotientNeurosurgeryEpilepsy surgeryDevelopmental psychologyMedicineNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We followed the neuropsychological development of five children who underwent unilateral neurosurgery of the occipitoparietal lobes as a treatment for epilepsy caused by a developmental lesion (cortical dysplasia). METHODS: The follow-up period ranged from 3-7 years postsurgery. RESULTS: Two participants had a verbal intelligence quotient (IQ) >100 and three had a verbal IQ between 65 and 80. All five children had abnormal nonverbal IQ and exhibited deficits related to visual attention, object recognition, and praxis. Nevertheless, our results suggest that brain plasticity after parietooccipital epilepsy surgery in young children allows for a schooling level of cognitive skills such as reading and arithmetic. DISCUSSION: Although recovery for visual perceptual cognition was more limited than for verbal functions, long-term neuropsychological outcomes showed that early surgery for epilepsy offers the possibility of optimizing cognitive outcomes in children with posterior intractable epilepsies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207