MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Analysis of the Unique Salt Culture and its Tourism Potentials in Zigong, Sichuan Province, China

2011· article· en· W1882119553 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiang Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCruise Tourism Development and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationChinaHumanitiesTourismPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Located in the south of Sichuan Province, southwest China, Zigong is famed for its unique salt culture. The city has a history of 1,900 years' rock (well) salt production starting from Zhangdi Emperor Period, the Eastern Han Dynasty (25~220 A.D.) , and has deposited a profound and noncloned salt culture in the world. This article intends to introduce the main cultural connotation of Zigong salt culture, reveal its unique features to the reader, analyses its tourism potentials and try to attract much more international investors and tourists to come to the site. Key words: Zigong Salt Culture; Feature; Tourism Resources; Tourism Potentials Resume: Situe dans le sud de la province du Sichuan, dans le sud-ouest de la Chine, Zigong est celebre pour sa culture du sel unique. La ville a une histoire de 1900 ans de production de sel de puit a partir de la periode de l'Empreur Zhangdi, de la dynastie des Han de l'Est (25 ~ 220 apres J.-C.), et a depose une culture de sel profonde dans le monde. Cet article tente d'introduire la connotation culturelle de la culture du sel de Zigong, reveler ses caracteristiques uniques aux lecteurs, analyser ses potentialites touristiques et essayer d'attirer plus d'investisseurs internationaux et de touristes a venir sur le site. Mots-cles: Culture de Sel de Zigong; CaractERistique; Ressources Touristiques; PotentialitE Touristique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicCruise Tourism Development and ManagementFrench-language works237,207