Recombinant expression and characterization of Solanum tuberosum aspartic protease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unique to aspartic proteinases from plants are the presence of approximately 100 amino acid regions, which are usually excised during activation of the zymogen. These sequences are termed ‘Plant-Specific Inserts’ and are implicated in membrane interactions of their parent enzymes, including vacuolar targeting and host defense. The need to further characterize the structure-function rol (s) of plant-specific inserts stimulated the current study of the characterization of Solanum tuberosum AP (StAP). Recombinant expression of wild-type StAP resulted in the 54 kDa protein being visualized by SDS-PAGE analysis with a protein yield of 0.03%. A protein purification factor could not be established since activation of the protein at pH 2.2, 3.0, 3.7 and 5.5 was not achieved as evidenced by a lack of change in band patterns on SDS-PAGE as well as acidification and hemoglobin degradation assays. To potentially improve enzyme folding and activation ability, two mutants, (1) lacking the pre-signal sequence and (2) lacking both the signal sequence and the prosegment, were designed, sub-cloned, and expressed. Both products proved to be insoluble and inactive. New constructs were designed for the expression of StAP inclusion bodies for insoluble expression and subsequent re-folding of the protein. Additionally, CysAla mutations for each PSI Cys residue were made to investigate the rol (s) of plant-specific insert disulfide bonds in plant aspartic proteinase enzyme folding and structure. All PSI cysteine mutations (eight mutants) were successfully created using QuickChange MutagenesisTM
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".