MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1882824745 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.1198

Identification of novel small molecule inhibitors of centrosome clustering in cancer cells

2013· article· en· W1882824745 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Eiko Kawamura, Andrew B. Fielding, Nagarajan Kannan, Aruna D. Balgi, Connie J. Eaves, Michel Roberge, Shoukat Dedhar

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersBC Cancer AgencyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance
KeywordsCentrosomeClonogenic assayMitosisCancer researchCancer cellBiologyBreast cancerCancerCell biologyCell cultureCell cycleGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Eiko Kawamura 1 , Andrew B. Fielding 1,2 , Nagarajan Kannan 3 , Aruna Balgi 4 , Connie J. Eaves 3,5 , Michel Roberge 4 , Shoukat Dedhar 1,4 1 Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada 2 current address: Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK 3 Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5 Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Correspondence: Shoukat Dedhar, email: // Keywords : Centrosome Clustering, multipolar mitosis, small molecule, cancer specific, spindle Received : September 10, 2013 Accepted : September 23, 2013 Published : September 25, 2013 Abstract Most normal cells have two centrosomes that form bipolar spindles during mitosis, while cancer cells often contain more than two, or “supernumerary” centrosomes. Such cancer cells achieve bipolar division by clustering their centrosomes into two functional poles, and inhibiting this process then leads to cancer-specific cell death. A major problem with clinically used anti-mitotic drugs, such as paclitaxel, is their toxicity in normal cells. To discover new compounds with greater specificity for cancer cells, we established a high-content screen for agents that block centrosome clustering in BT-549 cells, a breast cancer cell line that harbors supernumerary centrosomes. Using this screen, we identified 14 compounds that inhibit centrosome clustering and induce mitotic arrest. Some of these compounds were structurally similar, suggesting a common structural motif important for preventing centrosome clustering. We next compared the effects of these compounds on the growth of several breast and other cancer cell lines, an immortalized normal human mammary epithelial cell line, and progenitor-enriched primary normal human mammary epithelial cells. From these comparisons, we found some compounds that kill breast cancer cells, but not their normal epithelial counterparts, suggesting their potential for targeted therapy. One of these compounds, N2-(3-pyridylmethyl)-5-nitro-2-furamide (Centrosome Clustering Chemical Inhibitor-01, CCCI-01), that showed the greatest differential response in this screen was confirmed to have selective effects on cancer as compared to normal breast progenitors using more precise apoptosis induction and clonogenic growth endpoints. The concentration of CCCI-01 that killed cancer cells in the clonogenic assay spared normal human bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors in the colony-forming cell assay, indicating a potential therapeutic window for CCCI-01, whose selectivity might be further improved by optimizing the compound. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that treatment with CCCI-01 lead to multipolar spindles in BT-549, while maintaining bipolar spindles in the normal primary human mammary epithelial cells. Since centrosome clustering is a complex process involving multiple pathways, the 14 compounds identified in this study provide a potentially novel means to developing non-cross-resistant anti-cancer drugs that block centrosome clustering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207