Reduction of skin‐homing cytotoxic T cells (CD8<sup>+</sup>–CLA<sup>+</sup>) in patients with vitiligo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a frequently acquired, hereditary disease, characterized by achromic macules due to the absence of melanocytes. In contrast with earlier studies, in which the main pathogenic role was attributed to anti-melanocyte antibodies, recent papers have emphasized a role for CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes in melanocyte destruction. Fifteen percent of peripheral T cell express cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA), responsible for skin-homing T cell. Phototherapy is used to treat patients with generalized vitiligo and it has been shown to interfere with CLA(+) T cells in other skin diseases. OBJECTIVE: To describe peripheral blood T cell subpopulations' frequency and ability to express the skin-homing molecule (CLA) in patients with non-segmental vitiligo, before and after photochemotherapy (PUVA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with generalized and active spreading vitiligo were submitted to 30 PUVA-8MOP sessions. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry using anti-CD3, anti-CD8 and anti-CLA monoclonal antibodies. Fifteen healthy volunteers, sex- and age-matched, were included as a control group. RESULTS: CD8(+) -CLA(+) T cells were significantly reduced in number in untreated vitiligo patients (P=0.008) when compared with control individuals, albeit with a more intense CLA expression (P=0.028). These findings were not altered after PUVA. No significant difference was noticed in CD4/CD8 ratios nor in CD4-CLA(+) T cell numbers between vitiligo patients and controls, both before and after PUVA. CONCLUSIONS: CD8-CLA(+) T cells are reduced in peripheral blood of patients with non-segmental vitiligo. This finding may be related to the previously reported increase of CD8(+) cells in both lesions and perilesional skin of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".