MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Aging of the Population and Housing Reverse Mortgages in China

2010· article· en· W1883744953 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
An Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPensionPopulationSocial securityWelfare economicsPolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesBusinessEconomicsFinanceMarket economyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aging of the population is the inevitable result of social and economic development, while at the same time it exerts a major impact on the socio-economic and cultural development. The housing reverse mortgages allow the elderly to change properties into cashes and increase pension funds through their own resources to improve the quality of life in old age, and open up a new for solving the problem of pension. However, this project itself is huge, which calls for the government, the banks, insurance companies, social security departments and other relevant parties to unify their understanding, coordinate actions, and co-operate with each other. Key words: the aging of the population, housing reverse mortgages, Social Security Resume: Le vieillissement de population est la consequence inevitable du developpement economique qui exerce en meme temps une influence sur le developpement social et culturel. La mise en application de l’emprunt-logement inverse peut encourager les personnes âgees a utiliser leurs propres ressources pour rendre la proprietes bâties en cash, augementer leur pension de retraite, ameliorer leur qualite de vie. C’est une nouvelle pensee pour resoudre les problemes du vieillissement de la population. L’application de cette mesure est un travail colossal et complexe. Il faut que le gouvernement, les banques, les compagnies d’assurances et les departements de couverture sociale coordonnent leurs actions et travaillement en etroite collaboration. Mots-Cles: vieillissement de la population, emprunt-logement inverse, couverture sociale

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207