MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Primary Sjogren’s syndrome: cognitive symptoms, mood, and cognitive performance

2011· article· en· W1883916244 on OpenAlex
Barbara Segal, Brian Pogatchnik, Erin Holker, H. Liu, Jeff A. Sloan, N.L. Rhodus, K L Moser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Neurologica Scandinavica · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesUniversity of MinnesotaArthritis Foundation
KeywordsCognitionMoodMedicineClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships between self-reported cognitive abilities, psychological symptoms and neuropsychological outcomes in PSS. METHODS: Patients with Primary Sjogren's syndrome (PSS) and healthy controls completed a comprehensive neuropsychometric battery and questionnaires: the Centers for Epidemiological Scale-Depression, the Profile of Fatigue-mental domain (Prof-M) for cognitive symptoms, Fatigue Severity Scale, and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. RESULTS: Female patients with PSS (N = 39) were similar to controls (N = 17) in estimated premorbid intellectual function, age and education. Depression (P = 0.002), cognitive symptoms (P = 0.001), fatigue (P = 0.000003), and pain (P = 0.024) scores were greater in the patient group. Patients with PSS demonstrated inferior performance relative to controls in psychomotor processing (P = 0.027) and verbal reasoning (P = 0.007). Patients with PSS with and without depression had similar performance on multiple tests, but depressed patients had significantly lower scores for executive function (P = 0.041). Cognitive symptoms correlated with verbal memory (P = 0.048), whereas pain correlated with executive function measures (Stroop, P = 0.017) and working memory (Trails B, P = 0.036). In the regression model, depression and verbal memory were independent predictors that accounted for 61% of the variance in cognitive symptoms. CONCLUSION: The Prof-M is a simple self-report measure which could be useful in screening PSS subjects who may benefit from detailed psychometric evaluation. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that depression and verbal memory impairment are overlapping but independent aspects of neural involvement in PSS. While pain and depression are significant confounders of cognitive function in PSS, this study suggests that impaired verbal reasoning ability in PSS is not attributable to pain or depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it