Epidermal club cells and the innate immune system of minnows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thousands of fish species belonging to the Superorder Ostariophysi possess specialized club cells in their epidermis. Damage to the cells, as would occur during a predator attack, releases chemical substances that evoke antipredator responses in nearby shoalmates. These chemical substances have often been referred to as alarm substances and the cells that release them as alarm cells. Understanding the evolution of the cells in an alarm context has been difficult. The fish needs to be captured prior to the chemicals being released, hence the benefit to the receiver is unclear. Recent studies have suggested that the club cells are part of the immune system and are maintained by natural selection owing to the benefits that they confer against pathogens, parasites, and general injury to the epidermis. In the present study, we gave fathead minnows intraperitoneal injections of cortisol, a known immunosuppressant, or injections of a control substance (corn oil). We found that fish exposed to cortisol had suppressed immune systems (as measured by a respiratory burst assay) and that they also reduced their investment in club cells. This is the best evidence to date indicating that the club cells of Ostariophysan fishes are part of the innate immune system and that the alarm function of the cells evolved secondarily.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".