Finding "Enlightenment" in the National Archives of Canada: The Commonplace Book of James Sholto Douglas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article prsente l'exploration qu'a faite l'auteur relativement la provenance et au contenu des documents d'archives laisss par James Sholto Douglas, qui fut tudiant de l'Universit d'Edinbugh durant les annes 1750.Dans la foule du concept de science prt--porter ("ready-made" science) mis de l'avant par l'historien des sciences Bruno Latour, l'auteur tente de dmontrer que le processus d'acquisition, d'organisation et de description cre autour des documents une bote noire .En ouvrant cette bote, l'archiviste peut obtenir une meilleure comprhension, non seulement des documents, mais du processus de leur acquisition et de leur description.Ainsi, les archives de James Sholto Douglas ne sont pas qu'une excellente illustration de l'ducation et de la pense durant la priode des Lumires cossaise, ils permettent galement de bien dmontrer comment la dconstruction du contexte des documents est clairante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".