MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1884846484

Wind tunnel resonances and Helmholtz resonators

2007· article· en· W1884846484 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Peter Waudby-Smith, Ramani Ramakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHelmholtz resonatorWind tunnelResonatorHelmholtz free energyWind speedAcousticsNozzleParametric statisticsJet (fluid)Coupling (piping)Supersonic wind tunnelPhysicsSound pressureMechanicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyOpticsMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open jet wind tunnels can be impacted by low-frequency pressure fluctuations due to different feedback mechanisms coupling with vortices shed from the nozzle exit.These fluctuations can reduce the simulation quality o f the wind tunnel and/or reduce the effective wind speed range o f the facility.Considerable research has been conducted to understand the on-set o f these strong pressure fluctuations and different mitigation methods have been attempted to reduce these fluctuations.The idea o f using Helmholtz resonators to provide strong absorption in the low frequency regime has been around for a long time in different acoustical applications.It has been applied in aero-acoustic fields also to control cavity resonances.A parametric study o f applying Helmholtz resonators to control the pressure fluctuations in open-jet wind tunnels was undertaken.An existing open-jet tunnel was modified to produce strong low-frequency pressure fluctuations.A control volume to represent a Helmholtz resonator was attached to the wind tunnel.The control volume was made adjustable to produce different tuning frequencies to control fluctuations at different wind speeds.The results of the study are presented in this paper. s o m m a ir eLes souffleries aérodynamiques à veine ouverte peuvent être affectées par diverses fluctuations de basse fréquence dues à différents mécanismes de rétroaction engendrés par la configuration de la veine.De telles fluctuations peuvent même endommager la structure de la soufflerie si de fortes résonances en résultent.Ces fluctuations, réduiront habituellement la qualité de simulation de la soufflerie et/ou réduiront la gamme efficace de vitesse de vent de l'installation.Des recherches considérables ont été conduites pour compren dre le debut de ces fortes fluctuations de pression, ainsi différentes méthodes de réduction ont été tentés pour réduire ces fluctuations.L'idée d 'utiliser des résonateurs de Helmholtz pour fournir une forte absorption dans le régime de basse fréquence a été depuis longtemps employé dans différentes applications acoustiques.Cette approche a également été appliquée dans les domaines aéro-acoustique pour contrôler les résonances de cavité.Une étude paramétrique concernant l 'utilisation d 'un résonateur de Helmholtz pour contrôler les fluctuations de pression dans des souffleries aérodynamiques à veine ouverte a été entreprise.Une soufflerie aérodynamique à veine ouverte existante a été modifiée pour produire de fortes fluctuations de pression à basse fréquence.Un volume de contrôle, représentant un résonateur de Helmholtz a été fixé à la soufflerie.Le volume de contrôle a été rendu réglable pour produire différentes fréquences de mise au point et ainsi contrôler les fluctuations à différentes vitesses de vent.Cet article présente les résultats de l 'étude paramétrique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207